A Brave New (FOX) World

Fitz points vs SD

Yesterday’s announcement that Rupert Murdoch is launching another national sports network, FOX Sports World 1, may very well impact Northwestern, indirectly.

I’m curious how many of you eye rolled when you read the news that Rupert Murdoch was launching FOX Sports World 1.  “Yet, another “national” sports network? Why do we need that?” you may have wondered. It’s a good question.  Perhaps the better question for this audience is “what does it have to do with Northwestern?”

First, some background. In the past few years, the great sports cable race has ensued.  Two well-known network entities, NBC and CBS have launched and or rebranded existing cable nets (Versus and CSTV) with their brand names to add a sports cable channel to their sales portfolio.  As many of you know, the “cable model” is predicated on networks getting a dollar amount per subscriber per household per month.  It’s the backbone of the financial model, and it is extremely lucrative, if you can convince said cable operators to pay it. BTN (Big Ten Network), for example, gets approximately $1.10 per subscriber within the “footprint”, an industry word that means within the territories that are within the Big Ten geographical areas.  Outside of the footprint (ex – Houston or LA or San Francisco etc…) they get about $.10.  They’re in 53 million homes and with Maryland and Rutgers, that number is expected to jump big time in 2014 and beyond. Simply put, Jim Delany has said expansion is following the burgeoning demographic areas of the next 20-50 years, and the distribution and expansion of BTN is a key driver in these conversations. For comparison’s sake, $5.10 of your cable or satellite bill goes directly to ESPN, which is in 98 million homes. You don’t need to be a math whiz to know that’s a ton of dough before dollar one of advertising and other revenue streams even start.

It is also the basis for the large rights fees that ESPN doles out for blue chip properties like the NFL, MLB, NCAA and of course, the Big Ten Conference.  Live sports are the holy grail of television advertising because they are the most DVR-proof television out there and they have a highly coveted demographic.  ESPN has leverage because they have the sports rights to the things that, if a cable operator tried to boycott, would cause revolts, pitchforks and all. Northwestern directly benefits from this complicated matrix already.  The last deal Jim Delany cut was a 10-year, $1 billion rights fee deal to ESPN.  The incredible case study of a success that is the launch of BTN came with FOX backing the 20-year guaranteed payout to each school, which started at about $6 million per year per school and has escalators each year.  Plus NU gets a cut of the profits (FOX and Big Ten Conference own roughly 50% each and therefore split profits) indirectly through it’s Big Ten payout. BTN also pays a rights fee to the Big Ten Conference, just like ESPN does (but a much smaller number).  All told, these are the economic forces that combine to give Northwestern a mid $20 million per year check from the Big Ten. These are the economic forces behind the projected $43 million payout to Northwestern (and each of the B1G schools) in 2017 when the still-to-be-cut deal by Jim Delany and ESPN goes in to effect.

Enter FOX Sports World 1.  Their initial announcement revealed they will be leveraging FOX’s rights to things like MLB, NASCAR, UFC and…here is where it gets interesting…Pac12, Big12 and the NEW Big East/Catholic League and old Big East (or is it the other way around)?  Simply put, a new “buyer” just entered the market for Jim Delany.  While I may not have been an economics ace at NU, the more buyers you have for your coveted product, the more leverage you have as a seller. With the Big Ten brand continuing to increase in value, you can envision a rather interesting negotiation coming down the pike.  All of this is dependent upon FOX Sports World 1 (there is a FOX Sports World 2 – think ESPN2 – that is being created by converting the niche network FUEL) converting as many of the 83 million SPEED subscribers as possible. Think about the head start this network would have if it can convert most of them.  And command the $.75-$1 price point.  Wow.

Most of the articles on this launch talked about the fact this could be one of the first real attempts to take on ESPN that has a legitimate shot to at least make a dent. ESPN skipper, John Skipper, even threw out a platitude towards FOX, acknowledging they have the resources to throwdown.  Just ask CNN about the impact FOX has had in the news landscape.  This isn’t the first rodeo, either.  I actually worked for Fox Sports Net back in the mid 1990s when FOX made its first attempt, albeit by stringing together the then patchwork regional sports network model and hiring former SportsCenter icons Keith Olberman and Chris Meyers to anchor the nightly national sports news show on FSN. It failed. This, however is different.  The ability to get past that 60-70 million homes mark to truly be taken seriously by cable operators and advertisers as a “national” entity (a perception BTN still fights in its ad deals as they are perceived as national and don’t have national ratings that make it easy to buy from the media buyers’ perspective) is really intriguing here, because they have an incumbent, SPEED Channel, with 81 million subscribers and I think the average sports fan would say MLB, NASCAR, UFC and Pac 12 and Big 12 football/basketball along with the new Big East is of greater value to the consumer.

 

There is a downside to this for Wildcat fans, and it could be a big one. Recruiting. If you get any alone time with Pat Fitzgerald and ask him the single most impactful thing for Northwestern  during his tenure he’ll answer “no question, BTN”.  He’ll tell you it is one of the reasons we are killing it in places like Houston.  Kids are playing Friday nights and getting up on Saturday with a chance to watch us every single week. He’s heard from the players across the country, not just in the footprint, how they have access to all our games and it helps them track us and create a connection.  While other B1G schools can say the same, that isn’t the case for  any other league.  Think about how hard it is to find Stanford games and they are the easiest of the non B1G competitive set to find. Vanderbilt, Boston College, Duke – all buried.  Even now that we compete with a whole new set of competitors ranging from Cincinnati to West Virginia to Oklahoma and many that litter the Top 20.  Advantage B1G and Northwestern as far as access to the product.

The Pac12 and Big12 stand to gain a ton from this deal and likely erode this huge competitive advantage we’ve had.  I believe this is something that really could be a competitive threat. It’s all the more reason why we need to build off of a 10-win season, so that we become more desirable by the truly national network, ESPN and its seemingly subsidiary over the air (OTA in TV speak) network, ABC Sports.

On one hand, this deal sets up nicely for even more money in the coffers for Northwestern via its B1G membership check. On the other hand, a huge competitive advantage with the BTN may very well take  a hit as other leagues have access to a lot more games.  The day is coming when every major conference game will be accessible on one of the networks every week.

Practice Notes

The ‘Cats had an early practice yesterday and based on multiple reports filed by PurpleWildcats.com’s Nick Medline and WildcatReport.com’s Larry Watts, Rashad Lawrence is turning heads with some great hands so far this season.  Kain Colter had a reported tough day with his accuracy and Fitz was none too pleased with the energy at the start of practice.  Other than that, Rob Coons of NUSports.com filed this insightful and well-produced feature on the much discussed offensive line:

LTP Purple Pledge – Season Ticket Drive – Shoutout Time!

Yesterday we announced the start of our fifth annual Northwestern football season ticket drive, aka “The LTP Purple Pledge”.  Man, have you responded.  We’re counting NEW season tickets only on our quest to help set the all-time Northwestern season ticket record in 2013.  Stephen S. upped his four season tickets to six, and is invoking the bundling technique to get us to 22. Frank M. invoked this strategy again, and has gone from eight season tickets to ten to get us to 24. AlumDad went from four to six to get us to 26. And finally, Mark from Toledo increased his season ticket count by two to get us to 28! At this rate, we’ll be at 20% of goal by the weekend. Let’s keep it going. Simply click the link on the sidebar to order tickets or call 888-Go-PURPLE, purchase your tickets and then email us at laketheposts@gmail.com and we’ll give you a shoutout!

Purple Mafia Profile Link

Willie Weinbaum, a diehard ‘Cats fan and Purple Mafia Profilee posted this fascinating and sobering story as part of ESPN’s Outside the Lines series. With a seemingly massive increase in court storming this college basketball season, Weinbaum profiled 27-year-old Joe Kay, a former standout Stanford-bound star athlete whose life was forever changed by one such incident in high shcool.  Great piece Willie!

Lacrosse Home Opener

It’s another day and another mushy, post snow pounded city here in Chicago. Just the recipe for the ‘Cats women’s lacrosse home opener at Lakeside Field vs Boston College at 5pm ct. The Ryan Fieldhouse, which will enable the ‘Cats to play indoors on days like today, can’t get here quick enough!

 

 

 

  • Scott Feeney, CAS87

    If I may sidestep the issue of how this impacts NU for a moment, I would give Fox a word of advice. I use to like ESPN when it first started and when it was a calmer sports network, but over the years, it has become carried away with its own power and deviated away from practices that orginally made it attractive to many viewers.

    There are lots of people out there who are fed up with ESPN.

    - Fed up with its deceptive news broadcasting which is carefully designed to anchor your ass to the chair watching an endless number of sports stories that you care nothing about just hoping that they might get to your story eventually.

    - Fed up with ESPN intermingling multiple sports highlights. First an NFL score, then an NHL score, then a NASCAR story, then back to an NFL score.

    - Fed up with ESPN leading you to believe your story will be next right after a commercial break only to find out that it has switched to a different story when the commercial ends. I don’t have an extra hour in my day to wait around just hoping to see Washington Caps highlights.

    - Fed up with Sports score tickers that go into too much detail at the bottom of my screen instead of just giving me the damn scores.

    - Fed up of people yelling sports highlights at me as if I am hard of hearing.

    - Fed up with broadcasters who seem obsessed coming up with cute little play on words nicknames for every athlete they have a highlight on.

    - Fed up with ESPN’s overuse of superlatives to describe athletic plays that are just “very good.”

    - Fed up with ESPN giving air time to former athletes who cannot speak proper English.

    - Fed up with ESPN’s encouragement of pseudo-sports like the X games.

    To the extent that Fox attempts to copy ESPN, it will fail.

    To the extent, that Fox strikes out with its own model and recognizes how ESPN is turning off many viewers, it will succeed.

    Just the thoughts of an old school sports fan.

    • wcgrad

      You left out ESPN inserting itself in the middle of the conference realignment craze of the last few years as a way of protecting and promoting its interests (promotion of ACC, wooing of ND, abandonment of Big East) while trying to undermine others (collaboration with Longhorn Network of Big XII as a way of splitting up a Fox conference) and catering to the schools with the largest fanbases (esp for the ‘Insider’ portions – dOSU Michigan Alabama Texas PSU etc ALL have a ‘MASCOT_HERE_NATION’ segment). The problem is ESPN is NOT a news organization, they are an entertainment organization. So expect the partiality of Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, Ann Coulter and Al Franken, just don’t expect ESPN to own any of it.

    • http://twitter.com/LakeThePosts Lake The Posts

      Hence the freemarket system and why it works. More players, the more choice and its up to the consumers to make the decisions with their remotes.

      • Chasmo

        A free market system doesn’t exist in the TV industry.
        A free market would require cable and dish TV to be run on an ala carte basis with each channel putting a price on its product and subscribers just paying for the channels they watch. Consumers who hate sports could save by dropping ESPN while consumers who hate reality TV could save by dropping Bravo and MTV. If channels had to put a price on their products rather than hide behind the deals made with service providers, prices would drop as consumers could punish overpriced products by dropping them. And there would be no loss of service to consumers as happens now when the channel and the cable companies can’t strike a deal.
        A free market would require an end to the regional monopolies most cable companies enjoy and, as the phone company before them, cable companies would be required to provide competitors access to their cable lines to spur competition and lower prices.
        Of course, the TV industry is not interesting in operating in a free market, so it spends millions of dollars annually lobbying Congress to make sure ala carte pricing never becomes the law of the land and that regional cable monopolies continue.

        • http://twitter.com/LakeThePosts Lake The Posts

          A la carte is coming in my opinion.

    • Mark

      W don’t have cable and we went for about 15 years when our daughters were growing up without television. I read 4 newspapers and we now subscribe to Hulu Plus and Netflix. I do miss The Journey and some of the other Big Ten Network features – although I seem to be a person of low willpower so am probably better off without BTN. (That ’04 game between the Hoosiers and Purdue – got to see it! LOL)

    • CEBPD

      YOU FORGOT ESPN OWNS THE SEC AND MAKES THEM SEEM SUPER AWESOME. THIS HELPS THEM AND HURTS US IN THE RANKINGS. IF MORE FANS START WATCHING UNBIASED FS1, IT WILL BE MONEY AND ESPN WILL LOSE GROUND AND NOT HAVE FINAL AUTHORITY ON TEAMS. I LOVE THIS WHOLE IDEA. SEC HAS ESPN CONTRACTS!!! ITS SOO RIDIC BIASED SEC

    • Richard

      OK, but have you stopped watching ESPN? Because unless you do, the whining doesn’t matter.

      BTW, if the Fox sports and Fox News broadcasts are anything to go by, Fox will be even more extreme than ESPN in appealing to the lowest common denominator. All those things that annoy you about ESPN? Multiply them by 3X on Fox. And Fox Sports will grow because they’ll be more crass, more deceptive, and more juvenile than ESPN. Bank on it.

  • wcgrad

    One thing I find interesting is the “Sports Armageddon” on the horizon. With advertising revenues for sports staying flat, in spite of their DVR-proof commercials, and increasing consumer disgust at the ridiculous prices I pay for “basic” cable (I mean, have you looked at that $1000-$2000 bill you pay annually for a few hours of entertainment) especially when looking at the ridiculous number of channels that I will never watch. At this point, I only have cable for an internet provider, and I can get most of the entertainment that I want from that. I can listen to games for free on WGN online, or go to a bar and enjoy a meal and a few drinks while taking in the game. Thus, these ridiculously long TV contracts are going to end up biting someone, I don’t know if it will be the cable companies who recognize that they’re not getting what they are paying for and can’t find the advertising revenue and subscriber fees to make up the difference or the subscribers who will be locked into cable bills the size of a car payment to fund the cable carriers’ bloated bills to ESPN/FOX/CBS/NBC sports networks. Or will ESPN be paying huge sums to broadcast content that nobody wants to watch?

    Never mind the crumbling edifice of “amateurism” and the NCAA or concussions and football – both issues for which the cognitive dissonance may prove impossible to maintain into the future.

    • http://twitter.com/LakeThePosts Lake The Posts

      Leads to a day job conversation about Comcast bundling lawsuit and the potential of a la carte pricing, the buzz in the biz model conversations. Biggest threat to BTN.

  • skepticat

    “‘Yet, another “national” sports network? Why do we need that?’ you may have wondered.”

    I suppose ol’ Rupert feels that the sports market is missing that objective, fact-based voice with a “conservative” viewpoint.

    • Scott Feeney

      We certainly need another sports network. What other real sports network is there besides ESPN? Sure there are individual sports channels, but I would like some competition to ESPN.

      And from a political point of view, it would be nice to have a more conservative viewpoint in sports. It amazes me how worked up people get because there is one conservative media channel in a sea of liberal media.

      • TempeBob

        LOL politics on a sports blog… Also LOL at “sea of liberal media”

        • Scott Feeney

          Yeah I know, but all I can say is that I did not initiate the pot shots at Fox and Rupert Murdoch.

      • Dave

        How would a “conservative viewpoint in sports” be different than a liberal one? Are there differences in viewpoints of sports by political party?

        In my opinion the games are just games… The only difference I could think of is how the organization would report the business side of sports (labor laws, player rights, etc) in a strike.

        PS I’m not trying to spark a political discussion, just curious what you meant

        PPS this comment is sponsored by an independant political viewpoint

  • Blue Whale

    Does anyone know – when DC goes from out of market to in market next season, will BTN have to renegotiate with the local cable companies potentially pausing service, or will prices just contractually adjust automatically?

    • bradroc

      BTN has to renegotiate with each MSO in the Maryland and Rutgers “footprints”. There have already been reports (John Ourand at SBJ) that BTN will essentially “blackout” Rutgers and Maryland football/basketball games if the DC/NY cable systems do not agree to these new carriage terms. It’s my personal opinion that Rutgers and Maryland fans should prepare to lose at least one football/basketball season of non-ESPN produced games (that would otherwise have appeared on BTN), as I strongly believe most Cable providers will resist such a large increase for such a niche product in those markets.

      • http://twitter.com/LakeThePosts Lake The Posts

        This was the same game of chicken that happened around the launch of the network. If history serves as a guide for future behavior, those deals won’t finalize until day before, or to your point, after week one. Giant game of flinch.

  • bradroc

    While we’re on the topic of BTN, what’s up with Chicagoland’s leading cable provider (Comcast) not offering the BTN2GO streaming video product to their subs? Looks like I’ll be limited to apartments that will let me install a satellite dish when I move to the windy city next month.

    • SJ Wildcat

      Agreed on this one. Obviously, BTN and Comcast can’t agree on a price and as a result the fans can’t use this service. Very frustrating.

      • Alum Dad

        Agreed. I am PO’d at Comcast and BTN on this subject!

  • NUinVa

    This doesn’t really add to the convo, but I’m a huge fan of the NBC Sports network and was converted this winter. I love having the option of watching college hockey or skiing instead of NBA or repetitive shows. Sportscenter is nothing but Laker/LeBron talk with lots of loud, obnoxious music playing behind highlights. Too bad NBC Sports doesn’t show Big Ten.