The Day After Signing Day

Fitz ISO vs NEB 2012

A year ago, Pat Fitzgerald made headlines on National Signing Day by mocking recruiting rankings and services. This year, his brand took a lift thanks to his stance on calling out the lunacy of the recruiting process and his firm approach to commitment. Fellow NU blog, Inside NU, offered a great take on Fitz’s candid insights in to the new NCAA recruiting rules, which essentially enable coaches to barrage recruits with communication whenever they want. Fitz also received National Signing Day love from David Haugh of the Chicago Tribune on his stance on commitment, especially in the wake of former verbal, Ray Davison, who visited Cal (and eventually committed), knowing it would mean NU would pull back on its offer.

Fitz longed for an NFL-like approach to the NCAA rules, which doesn’t allow “the league” to talk to undergrad players until they are seniors. Yet, in college, Fitz must play the stakes and talk to 14 and 15-year-old kids, which he believes inflates egos and is detriment to everyone. It comes across as earnest and Fitz vows to fight the NCAA rules on this.  On a day when things like oversigning (Texas A&M signed 34 players) gets brushed under the rug in lieu of ridiculous ratings (Rivals national rankings skew favorable to size of class over quality), it is a time of  both excitement for fans, but also a little squirmy for those of us making a big deal over high school kids.

Northwestern’s overall class was ranked 51st, from an aggregate ranking, which is slightly up from a year ago.  Any and every recruiting pundit has claimed this is Fitz’s best class yet. Teddy Greenstein outlined the fact the sales pitch has gone from the Gary Barnett-ism of “Belief without Evidence” to having concrete evidence (aka 10 wins).   In Greenstein’s article, he mentioned Tom Lemming’s quote, which summarizes what we diehards have come to know and love:

“It’s a typical Northwestern class. “They’re all smart, overachiever types with better athletic ability than people give them credit for.” – Tom Lemming, CBS Sports recruiting analyst.

Now, let’s take the LTP take on the class of 2013 recruits:

Biggest Get: QB, Matt Alviti. This isn’t news to you. The Maine South (Park Ridge, IL) has been the crowned jewel of the class and is a top ten QB nationally.  Alviti grew up a fan of Dan Persa and bleeds purple and happened to sit behind me at most games this year (unlucky for him). He is the Colter/Persa/Kustok-like true dual threat, but appears to have the accuracy of Persa and the escape factor of Colter.  He’s going to redshirt, but 2014 will be interesting as it will be hard to keep him off the field, even though it will likely be Trevor Siemian’s show.  He chose NU over Ohio State and Nebraska among others and I learned from folks that several big players, including Michigan, recruited him hard even though he was committed.

Instant Impact: Godwin Igwebuike

The Scout 4-star RB/S was up for Mr. Football in Ohio and had eye-popping stats. With Venric Mark and Mike Trumpy manning the RB slot, and Treyvon Green, Malin Jones and even Jordan Perkins potentially in the mix, it will be interesting to see where they play Godwin. The ‘Cats also have a pair of Wisconsin-like big RBs in this class, so it wouldn’t be a surprise to see him move to the secondary.

Most Underrated: Hunter Niswander

Hunter and Godwin are also tied for “best name” in my opinion as well. Niswander (Nice-wonder) is a potential all-purpose kicker (PK, KO, Punter) and is one of the top 10-15 rated at his position. With Mr. Automatic, Jeff Budzien, showing exactly what kind of a luxury it is to have a phenomenal kicker, we needed to shore up the future at this all-important, often overlooked spot.

Couple Years Away: Several

Northwestern really seemed to excel on the line with guys like Tyler Lancaster (the 6th ranked center, by Scout), Blake King and especially Brad North, who won a Texas state title as an OL.  These guys are sure to redshirt, but you can bet will start getting reps in 2014 as our line turns over.

I’m curious to get your take on guys in the class and where you see instant impact or super value long term.  Fitz only played three true freshmen last year, once you take Ifeadi out of the mix (redshirted due to injury), but there were a ton of underclassmen playing as it seemed the program has turned a corner where the younger, somewhat higher caliber players, forced Fitz to get away from favoring seniority.

 

  • Richard

    Agree on recruiting. The way NCAA football does it is insane. I don’t have a problem with lifting the restrictions (which coaches would always try to find a way around in such a cutthroat business) but they should have an early signing period (like NCAA basketball does) and allow coaches to attend AAU-type events (like college basketball does) so that coaches don’t have to drive several hours to middle-of-nowhere places to woo recruits. Put in a hard no-contact-before-Jan-of-junior-year rule with an early signing period in August and allow summer visitations, and the crazy period can be cut substantially. Most top recruits would be signed before football season starts, while late bloomers would still have some spots at the traditional deadline.

  • das420

    Looks like a pretty strong class, with a nice emphasis on speed and athleticism. I put little stock in the rankings, but was surprised to see us in the fifties (as well as behind Illinois). Is that mostly a factor of a smaller class?
    On another note, I couldn’t agree more with Fitz’s assertiion that the system makes no sense. Grown men pandering to 14-15 year old kids is kind of sick. And, the overrecruiting by certain institutions is a pretty disingenous message to send to kids who believe they’re making a 4-year commitment.

    • Wildcat Fan

      Yes, our smaller class size makes a huge difference in our ranking. Since Fitz picks kids that rarely transfer or flunk out, we don’t get to take as many players to get to the 85 max. Illinois will always have more scholarships available due to higher turnover therefore their signing class will always appear better than ours. It’s even worse in the SEC. The SEC has a huge competitive advantage, not only do they over sign but they also gray shirt players!
      They may end up with 95 kids on their team then they self select by telling injured players or players that aren’t as good that they are basically off the team. I personally think this is why the SEC does so well. It gives Alabama and the other SEC schools more of a competitive advantage than any of the violations that result in NCAA sanctions today. I would love to hear someone come on Lake the Posts to address gray shirting and the gross over signing done in the SEC. They start the year with half of the top 10 teams then they play weak out of conference schedules (i.e. Vanderbilt dropping us) so when they get into their conference games they hardly fall in the rankings when they lose to another SEC top 10 team. They are guaranteed a minimum of 2 teams in the BCS playoffs every year. Besides the gray shirting scam, the Cam Newton case proves that they rule the NCAA.
      Back to our great signing class!!!!! Got to love FITZ and NU football!!!!!!!

    • NUBobby95

      Also, NU is one of the only schools who offer a four year scholarship. Look at what Bama and some of the other schools do to kids who get hurt or don’t live up to expectations. They are typically forced out.

  • Mark

    Integrity in the process, excellence in academics, holding out sane recruiting standards, outstanding football team, great recruits!! Go Cats!

  • MF

    How reliable are recruiting ratings? To wit, last year’s biggest true-frosh contributor, Dan Vitale, was only a “2-star” recruit.

    • cbepd

      Dan vitale Performance /(all 2 star recruits) <<<<<< 5 star recruit performance/(all 5 star recruits)

    • Mark

      Great point. And Lowery’s contribution on the D line was significant and even, comparatively, rarer. Linemen, except the five star and some of the four star recruits, aren’t expected to contribute much early on as they get heavier and stronger.

  • Jimgocats93

    Kudos to Coach Fitz and staff!

    This is an incredibly athletic group with the common denominator being speed. To develop a system which targets and attracts these talented “right fit kids” is to be commended.
    Now we will see how they develop over the next 4- 5 years.
    Welcome guys!

    Gocatsgo!

  • cebpd

    Days like these are where we see a real disconnect between Northwestern and the rest of the college football world. Where we are welcoming players and talking about the integrity of our process, all else of CFB is like, “well they wont ever get a awesome class! omg!”

    Love being a Wildcat.

    • Chasmo

      We all love the way Northwestern does things but one wonders if the devil asked NU fans to sell our souls for NU to be granted the football status other private schools like Notre Dame or USC have, would we do it?
      Wouldn’t NU fans love to see people sporting NU gear all over the country, major sports talk shows always talking about NU, and highly rated recruits all visiting NU, and NU ranked in the Top 20 annually and competing for a national championship every few years?
      We can say we would prefer to be ranked No. 1 in the nation in graduation rate (and be middle of the pack on the field) to being No. 1 in the nation on the field (and be middle of the pack in graduation rate) but did NU’s No. 1 ranking in academics give you as big a thrill as winning the Gator Bowl?

      • cece

        yes we’d love to see people taking about us, especially talk shows. let’s make a list here of all the NU grads in sports journalism and do our own job of feeding them info.

        but, no, not sell our souls with cutting or slashing corners to get there!

  • UVA Cat

    Totally off topic, but very nice bokeh (lens blur) on the photo for this post.

  • Alaskawildcat

    Maybe it is time for the NCAA to put a premium on the student part of student athlete in the recruiting process. Schools with higher graduation rates would be rewarded by being allowed to take more higher star rated recruits while those who make a joke out of the educational experience would face a cap on the number of 4 and 5 star rated players the can add to their program in any single year.

  • Ron

    It’s a wonder to me that more college coaches don’t leave for the NFL more quickly. At least at that level, their success isn’t determined by how well they can recruit kids who have just hit puberty.

    • Chasmo

      More college coaches don’t leave for the NFL because they don’t want to work with adults who can talk back. Viking coaching great Bud Grant once said, “In college, it’s the players’ job to get along with the coach; in the pros, it’s the coach’s job to get along with the players.”
      As degrading as recruiting can be, being a college coach means having total control over your work force == you get paid millions annually via long term contracts that you can break but the school can not while your players get paid room and board with contracts that you renew on a year to year basis but the players can’t transfer unless you give them their release and if they do transfer they have to sit out a year.
      It’s the perfect system for a tyrannical personality and so many coaches wouldn’t dream of leaving.

  • Purple to Pasadena

    This is a very good recruiting class. It’s similar to last year, where we start out with the big name local guy (Malin Jones/ Matt Alviti), then add some good OL, and throw in a big-time safety prospect (Traveon/ Godwin). Last year, we landed the big prize at the end (Odenigbo), and this year we missed on Clark. But what is different this year from last year and seemingly any other year I can remember is that we have up to four guys (Queiro, Watkins, McShepard and Harris) slated to play DB, and it looks like there is reason to be optimistic about all of them. Given the way we lock in guys early and the way we don’t look to poach recruits, we probably have less signing day drama than any other school. But that shouldn’t take away from our enthusiasm for this excellent crop of Wildcats!

    • PurpleHayes

      Great point by my namesake “Purple” commenter. There are a few theories on why we have never been able to recruit CB’s (including the smarter athletes become WR’s, etc.), but I agree this is a good indication of recruiting depth and strength. I don’t place much weight on recruiting class overall ratings, either, but my informal barometer has always been this: for the recruits we land, who are the schools we beat out? I see Ohio State, Nebraska, and Michigan listed in the LTP post (OK all re: Alviti), but check the whole class and you’ll see some pretty representative names. Wasn’t that many years ago the majority of our recruits were choosing Northwestern over the likes of Western Michigan, Illinois State, and Yale. Choosing 18-year-olds is probably more art than science, and counting on any particular recruit (Prater?) is dangerous, but I do think it’s a numbers game, and dipping into the premiere bucket is the best way to get more premiere outcomes. Fitz is putting us there. Go Cats!

  • JM

    Prediction: Alviti redshirts this year and is worked in as the “running/red zone QB” (like Persa during Kafka’s senior year or Colter during Persa’s) during Trevor’s senior season.

    It will be interesting to see if Zach Oliver (a fairly touted recruit himself who we read good things about) can hold him off any longer than that.

    • gocatsteve

      Further prediction… Alviti will be a star by his Junior year. He scrambles like Colter, is precise on his throws like Persa, has a stronger arm than Persa, and like Persa (and unlike Colter) continues to look down the field when scrambling. I watched him a couple of times his past year… very, very good.