Week 3 of the BTB Roundtable has LTP lamenting fact that Weis is doing everything he can to diminish 9/2/95 so I want ND back on the schedule. See below for the rationale.LTP: Did you not watch the Ohio Bobcats gift-wrap the game to the Buckeyes? We are far from through the OOC play with two games left. The good news is week four will get some attention as we host the Bobcats in Evanston, however, we've got an in-state battle with Southern Illinois this weekend for our week three opponent. Quick fact - the Cats are the only Big Ten team to play two BCS opponents to date - granted Syracuse is indistinguishable from the worst team in the country - but to answer your question, I'm not happy just being 2-0. Our offense has yet to click, which is a puzzle, as we're loaded with both depth and seniors at the skilled positions. Our speedball offense backfired this weekend against Duke as we had way too many quick series. Bottom-line? We need to convert on 3rd down as we're an anemic 7-30 on 3rd down conversions against Syracuse and Duke. The Cats are in need of a statement game - one in which we dominate from start to finish - something a Pat Fitzgerald coached team has yet to do.
M&B: You knew this was coming. This week's OMG Game of the Century!!!!1!!1!! until next week's OMG Game of the Century!!!!1!!1!!is Ohio State versus Southern Cal. Who are you pulling for and why?Further, if you're pulling for one particular team tell me why they'll win, or won't. If you're like me and will be attempting to cure a sunburn from over-exposure to the sun during the Michigan-Notre Dame game by drinking large quantities of whiskey instead of watching the game, state your excuse.
LTP: While SIU is not Appalachian State, they are the 9th most successful program in the past 5 years (at all levels), averaging 10 wins per year during that span. I HATE playing FCS teams since I rarely see upside, but this game may actually help improve Northwestern's inexplicably piss-poor home attendance. Michigan-Notre Dame will be painful to watch, and as mentioned all eyes are on USC-Ohio St. If I had to pick one it would be a toss-up between the Purdue-Oregon game, which I'm pulling hard for the Boilers and Iowa vs Iowa State in the rubberneck game - you know, the car wreck that you shouldn't watch but simply can't avoid finding out how the Hawkeyes will blow yet another game against their in-state rivals. Iowa is the early season surprise in my mind. Yes, they were predicted to go 2-0, but are doing so in Buckeye-like beatdown fashion. I envy the domination factor.
LTP: Wow. Great question. I'm a little to hyper-sensitive to boosting attendance, but also value the maximizing OOC wins, until Northwestern puts together a 4 or 5 straight year bowl appearance streak. I would pick NIU and Notre Dame, but on my conditions. We play a 3-1 home, home, home, road with Northern Illinois and a home and home with Notre Dame and NO Solider Field game for our "home" game. Northern Illinois is a team on the rise with the very successful former SIU coach, Jerry Kill, and is also the best draw we've had in the non-conference in the past decade. So, I'm taking NIU for attendance and local interest and I'm taking Notre Dame b/c they've fallen to the point where I'd expect to beat them at least every other game and thus chip away at the media share the Irish get here in Chicago. Obviously, a Notre Dame game would be a guaranteed sell-out and so the NIU/ND combo would give us the early season ticket boost we need to sustain the momentum towards packing Ryan Field regularly.
With each passing week sending ND further into CFB obscurity, I somehow finding myself wanting the evil empire to be good for the good of college football. The landmark landing out of Northwestern's dark ages is 9/2/95, our monumental 27 1/2 point underdog victory over the then potential national champion Irish, somehow is starting to lose relevance. I'm going to have to start spending more energy reminding young fans why and how this game was important if it keeps on "in my day, Notre Dame was very good...". Despite this, I can't help but root for the Big Ten for a September beat down. Go Michigan. Go Michigan State. Go Purdue. Let's get the hattrick.
LTP: Hey, I take offense to that. What about the omission of my boxer shorts?!!! Let's see, considering I'm in my seats well before 11 am CT, I actually don't drink until post-game. I'm too much of a dork and want to enjoy the game free of mental impingements. After a win, I'll go pretty much anything since it all seems to taste good. When we lose? Fat Tire, as I try to mentally go to the mountains of Colorado and wax philosophical about the fact 18-year-olds running up and down a field with a piece of leather really is not going to change the universe.

4 comments:
This week's installment of "Reasons NU fans should be proud and excited about this season":
From Lindsey Willhite in the Daily Herald - "The Wildcats lead the Big Ten in third-down conversion defense (26.7 percent), rank third in pass-efficiency defense (99.1 rating) and 29th nationally in scoring defense (15.0 points per game)."
Sure, you might say - big deal, they've played Syracuse (who is arguably the worst BCS conference team) and Duke (traditional ACC doormat).
I would, however, counter that we've actually had (so far) one of the tougher early Big Ten schedules. First off, while Syracuse is legitimately awful, they're still a BCS conference team, and arguably/perhaps better than OSU's competition so far (Youngstown State and Ohio) -- I could be wrong there, but I think Syracuse would give you a better/tougher opponent 9 times out of 10 than those two.
Second, as NU fans we should be sensitive to the "doormat reputation" problem that Duke has. Make no mistake, that Duke team is going to be legitimately GOOD in the ACC, albeit in a weak year for the conference as a whole. In fact, I would not be surprised in the slightest to see them win up to 7 games this year (I think they can/could/should beat Navy, Virginia, Vandy, NC State, and might give Georgia Tech, Miami, North Carolina, and weakened Clemson and Va. Tech tough games). That tough win on the road may look a WHOLE lot better later on this season, especially if the Blue Devils can keep up the fan enthusiasm.
And third, it's not like the rest of the Big Ten has been playing really tougher competition. Illinois, MSU, and Michigan all had tough week 1 opponents, but then played Eastern Illinois, Eastern Michigan, and Miami (OH) this week, respectively, none of whom compare favorably with either Syracuse or Duke. OSU beat Youngstown State and Ohio; Indiana has played Western Kentucky and Murray State; Minnesota played Northern Illinois and Bowling Green; Penn State has a win over Oregon State but also played Coastal Carolina; and Iowa is feasting on the likes of Maine and Florida International.
And yet we're leading the conference in third-down conversion defense? Third in pass efficiency defense? And are 29th NATIONALLY in scoring defense (and have arguably played better than that, since Sutton's fumble to begin the 2nd half against Syracuse basically gift wrapped points in that game)?
I'd say we have a LOT to be excited about....
As for non-conference scheduling (the Roundtable question), I agree I'd like to see Notre Dame on our schedule in a home and home without Soldier Field, and like the idea of Northern Illinois in a 3-1.
I also agree with LTP that scheduling FCS teams provides literally no upside, ESPECIALLY for a team like Northwestern -- if we win big, well we should have. If we win close, or god forbid lose, well it makes us look terrible. And even though SIU might travel pretty well to NU, FCS teams really don't offer a big attendance boost.
As for other non-conference teams, I'd like to see any of the following become regularly scheduled/considered opponents on a rotating basis:
- Duke (love the ACC/Big Ten academic challenge aspect to this)
- Boston College (same)
- Georgia Tech (same)
- Virginia (same, plus UVA is my grad school alma mater, and roadtrips to Charlottesville would be magical)
- Wake Forest
- Army/Navy/Air Force (love of country thing, but I love playing the service academies, and we'd get good attendance in Chicago, especially for Navy I imagine)
- Miami (OH) - (for Randy Walker)
- BYU (normally a fun offense so it might be a shootout, competitive, and again it travels well to boost our attendance)
- Stanford (I want blood from Harbaugh for dirty recruiting, plus this match up makes sense)
- Vandy (SEC-Big Ten matchup that makes sense given school sizes, academic reputations, etc.)
- Tennessee/Kentucky (call me crazy, but wouldn't these Northern-most SEC school teams be fun to play, too?)
Of course, all of these would have to be home and homes....we need the boost in attendance, and I don't think any of those teams really should look down on getting access to the Chicago media-market for recruiting/publicity purposes, either.
Chaddogg, you're not the first person on this board to suggest that Boston College and Georgia Tech are good opponents for NU because they have similar academic reputations/restrictions. I think LTP has said the same himself.
Can someone please educate me on this new development?
BC and GT are wonderful academic institutions, but seriously, when it comes to sports...? I have never heard anyone marvel "Wow, that Bobby Cremins was a genius. He took his teams to Final Fours even though he couldn't recruit most of the nation's best players".
Please.
@chaddogg...while there is reason for optimism, I think in 10 weeks you may want to revisit your statement as Syracuse would be sub-.500 in the MAC this year and comparing them to anyone's schedule is dangerous as they are the top candidate to go 1-11 of any BCS team, or any team, for that matter. Find me a win outside of Northeastern on their schedule. I agree the defensive stats are "positives" at this point, but remember after 2 games last year - Northeastern and Nevada - we were averaging 15.5 ppg (not sure national ranking at that time) scoring defense. After week 3 we were averaging 17 ppg scoring defense. Yes, the 3rd down percentage is encouraging, but against Duke they rarely GOT to a 3rd down as they gashed us with 5 yard rushes and 15 yard passes regularly. I'd offset the 3rd down conversion with an anemic 7-30 of our own on defense. Good segue for my Statement Game post in a few hours!
@ George - good points, and yes, this post has a soft spot for BC, but agree it is not at the same level of academic threshold for FB players. I would argue Wake Forest is...and tell me this year's team doesn't remind you of the '96 Cats!
Post a Comment